The point of this case study was to see the impact Stephen Curry had
on the 2015 NBA Finals and to see if he should have been named Finals MVP or if Andre Iguodala should have.
To quantify Curry’s impact I had two separate categories. First was
his direct points, which were his actually points scored, the points he
assisted on, and the foul assists (points a player scored at the free throw
line after being fouled on Curry’s pass); so in each game I added all three
numbers together to get his direct points. The second category I had was his
gravity points, which were hockey assists, double hockey assists, no help, no
rotation, and screen assist (All in video breakdown). I think most people would
agree Curry has the greatest gravity in NBA history; gravity is the pull a
player has on a defense because of a certain skill set they posses. For example
DeAndre Jordan has gravity towards the rim because of his alley-oop catching
ability; this forces the defense to shade in towards the paint to stop this
from happening. In Curry’s case it’s his three-point shooting and play making
abilities. These two skills cause defenses to do a couple things, first is,
they try to deny him from ever catching the ball, which means the defender on
Curry never helps off of him and most of the time just face guards him. This
opens lanes for Curry’s teammates to attack because there is less help defense
(See No Help/Rotation in video breakdown). The second positive Curry’s gravity
has is when he is dribbling; in almost every pick and roll situation Curry was
blitzed (hard trapped by his defender and the screen setters defender) in this
Cleveland series. This allowed Curry to extend the defense and find the open
man to pass it to because two defenders were on him. Typically this resulted in
a pass to Draymond Green who then was able to attack downhill in a 4 on 3
advantage.
After I counted all Curry’s direct points and gravity points I would
add them together to get his total impact or the “Curry Impact” on the offense
side of the ball. For the entire series Curry’s direct points impact was an
average of 44.6% percent of the offense per game and his direct + gravity
points impact or the “Curry Impact” was an average of 59.1% percent of the
offense. This was also not just for the time Curry was on the floor, but for
the entire game, which makes this even more impressive. Curry averaged 42.1 minutes
per game for the series and games 1&2 went to overtime.
The next area I wanted to look at was Curry’s affect on Iguodala’s
offense. I’ll start with the basic box score numbers as a baseline; Curry
averaged 26 points, 6.3 assists, and 5.2 rebounds on 44% FG, 38.5% 3pt, 88.5%
FT: Iguodala averaged 16.3, 4 assists, and 5.8 rebounds on 52% FG, 40% 3pt, and
35% FT. As you can see, a case for Iguodala would be he shot a higher
percentages from the field and from three, however the counter argument would
be his shots were much different from Curry’s. Iguodala was considered wide
open (five feet of space from defender) on 57% of his shots, while Curry only
on 7% of his shots. This is also very noticeable on Iguodala’s shots in my
video breakdown. However, the second area you could make an argument for
Iguodala in terms of the box score stats would be box plus/minus. For the
series Iguodala was a plus 62 for the series, while Curry was a plus 52 for the
series. Now this isn’t a huge difference, but it’s definitely an edge for
Iguodala.
Next, I wanted to dig deeper to see how many of Iguodala’s points
and assists Curry affected or assisted on. To do this I looked at all the
gravity points, basic assists, and foul assists Curry affected. For example, if
Curry assisted or hockey assisted on Iguodala’s points I counted it in the
points column; if Curry had a hockey assist and Iguodala was the passer in the
middle I counted that in Iguodala’s assist column. After subtracting all the plays where Curry
had an imprint on Iguodala, his final stats were an of averaged 8.6 points and
3.3 assists per game, rather than 16.3 and 4. Curry directly assisted on eight
of Iguodala’s baskets during the series and seven of eight would be considered
wide-open. He also hockey/double hockey assisted on five of his baskets, four
of which would be considered wide-open, and foul assisted on another two shots.
There were also ten wide-open shots that Curry directly passed or hockey passed
to him that were all missed (5 and 5). However, Iguodala only assisted Curry on
three baskets during the series; two of them were in a fast break and the other
one was a very contested three Curry made.
It was amazing to see the total impact Curry had not only on
Iguodala, but everyone on the team. Throughout the six game series Curry
assisted on 25 baskets that would be considered “wide-open” (five feet of space
from defender) and created another 20 that would also considered wide-open but
were missed shots. He also created another 11 wide-open hockey/double hockey
assisted shots that were missed. There were another 27 shots that he created
that were considered makeable, but not wide open; this equated to an extra 54
points that the Warriors didn’t score. I also tracked the total missed
opportunities that Curry either directly or indirectly created a good shot for
a teammate and Warriors didn’t score. These were the categories of missed
assists, shots missed on no rotation/help off of Curry, open plays, and missed
hockey assists (All in the video breakdown); this total number was 162 points
that the Warriors could have scored because of Curry, but didn’t.
There were also a lot of little factors along the way that Curry
impacted, but it was hard to quantify. Examples of these factors are his
non-stop movement, which really drains defenders, as noted after game three
when Mathew Dellavedova had to get IV’s injected to rehydrate himself. Also,
the impact his gravity had on one on one situations that he created for
teammates in the post. The fouls the Cavs picked up from chasing him around
trying to grab him or the big timely shots Curry hit in a lot their games and
fourth quaters. Finally, the 37-point game he had in the pivotal game five win
that really shifted the series after it was tied 2-2. There were so many small
and large factors that he impacted throughout this entire series.
In conclusion, Stephen Curry was clearly the most important and
valuable player in this series. Being the engine for almost 60% of the Warriors
total offense is an astounding number and the reason why he should have been
named the 2015 NBA Finals MVP.
Video Breakdown:
Curry Impact:
Game 1: 108-100 GSW à Curry : 42 min, +4, 26
Pts, 8 Ast (=20 pts)
·
Direct Points = 52 pts or 48% of GSW total
points
·
Direct + Gravity Points = 72 pts or 66% of GSW
total points
·
Iguodala à
31 min, +8, 15 Pts, 2 Ast
·
Curry Impact = 10 of Iguodala’s points/ 1 Ast.
Game 2: 95-93 CLE à Curry : 42 min, -2, 19
Pts, 5 Ast (=13 pts)
·
Direct Points = 34 pts or 36% of GSW total
points
·
Direct + Gravity Points = 41 pts or 44% of GSW
total points
·
Iguodala à
36 min, +2, 7 Pts, 5 Ast
·
Curry Impact = 3 of Iguodala’s points/ 1 Ast.
Game 3: 96-91 CLE à Curry : 43 min, -6, 27
Pts, 6 Ast (=13 pts)
·
Direct Points = 42 pts or 46% of GSW total
points
·
Direct + Gravity Points = 60 pts or 65% of GSW
total points
·
Iguodala à
36 min, +6, 15 Pts, 5 Ast
·
Curry Impact = 6 of Iguodala’s points/ 1 Ast.
Game 4: 103-92 GSW à Curry : 41 min, +18,
22 Pts, 7 Ast (=16 pts)
·
Direct Points = 44 pts or 42% of GSW total
points
·
Direct + Gravity Points = 60 pts or 58% of GSW
total points
·
Iguodala à
36 min, +16, 22 Pts, 0 Ast
·
Curry Impact = 10 of Iguodala’s points/ 0 Ast.
Game 5: 104-91 GSW à Curry : 42 min, +24,
37 Pts, 4 Ast (=9 pts)
·
Direct Points = 50 pts or 48% of GSW total
points
·
Direct + Gravity Points = 65 pts or 62% of GSW
total points
·
Iguodala à
42 min, +16, 14 Pts, 7 Ast
·
Curry Impact = 8 of Iguodala’s points/ 1 Ast.
Game 6: 105-97 GSW à Curry : 43 min, +14,
25 Pts, 8 Ast (=18 pts)
·
Direct Points = 51 pts or 48% of GSW total
points
·
Direct + Gravity Points = 64 pts or 60% of GSW
total points
·
Iguodala à
36 min, +14, 25 Pts, 5 Ast
·
Curry Impact = 12 of Iguodala’s points/ 0 Ast.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.